1.
Pilot trial of a group cognitive behavioural therapy program for comorbid depression and obesity.
Lores, T, Musker, M, Collins, K, Burke, A, Perry, SW, Wong, ML, Licinio, J
BMC psychology. 2020;8(1):34
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression and obesity are significant global health concerns. Depression can significantly impact physical health and reduced immune function. The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of a novel group psychological intervention program. The study is a preliminary quasi-experimental (single-arm) before-after pilot trial of a newly developed group-based psychological intervention program for people with depression and comorbid obesity. The program consisted of 10 two-hour group sessions held weekly. A total of 24 participants were recruited to the program across two pilot groups. Results indicate that there was a significant reduction in participants’ depression and anxiety scores by program-end. Some evidence also shows improvements in weight-related negative cognitions. Authors conclude that the group therapy program therefore has considerable potential to be effective in helping people enjoy better mental health and improve health outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and obesity are significant global health concerns that commonly occur together. An integrated group cognitive behavioural therapy program was therefore developed to simultaneously address comorbid depression and obesity. METHODS Twenty-four participants (63% women, mean age 46 years) who screened positively for depression with a body mass index ≥25 were recruited from a self-referred general population sample. The group therapy program (10 two-hour weekly sessions) was examined in a single-arm, before-after pilot trial, conducted in a behavioural health clinic in Adelaide, Australia. Primary outcomes included survey and assessment-based analyses of depression, anxiety, body image, self-esteem, and weight (kg), assessed at four time-points: baseline, post-intervention, three-months and 12-months post program. Eighteen participants (75%) completed the program and all assessments. RESULTS Significant improvements in depression, anxiety, self-esteem and body shape concern scores, several quality of life domains, eating behaviours and total physical activity (among others) - but not weight - were observed over the course of the trial. CONCLUSIONS Results from this pilot trial suggest that combining interventions for depression and obesity may be useful. Further development of the program, particularly regarding the potential for physical health benefits, and a randomised controlled trial, are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration: ANZCTR, ACTRN12617001079336, 13 July 2017. Retrospectively registered after date of the first consent (6 July 2017), but before the date of the first intervention session (20 July 2017).
2.
One- and Two-Year Effects of the Healthy Primary School of the Future on Children's Dietary and Physical Activity Behaviours: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Bartelink, NHM, van Assema, P, Kremers, SPJ, Savelberg, HHCM, Oosterhoff, M, Willeboordse, M, van Schayck, OCP, Winkens, B, Jansen, MWJ
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diet and Physical Activity (PA) habits are formed at a young age, and unhealthy habits can lead to childhood obesity and lifelong health problems. Schools are globally recognised as having access to children across all socio-economic backgrounds and to play an important role in influencing healthy habits. This Dutch experimental longitudinal study looks at the impact Primary schools can have on the health of their students by implementing a dedicated Nutrition and PA Program called ‘Healthy Primary Schools for the Future (HPSF), modelled on an American initiative, piloted in 4 schools and 2 control schools. The study tests whether a fully implemented program (focused on Nutrition and PA - including free lunches & daily PA sessions) or a partial program (focused only on PA sessions) influences healthy change in children’s behaviours versus control schools (no program). The data from 1676 children aged 4-12 yrs was used and the study took place over 3 yrs (2015-2017) with a commitment to continue till 2019 where follow-up data could be obtained. The data was collected once a year using parental and child questionnaires. Additional movement data was obtained from accelerometers the children wore for 7 days during each annual measurement week. The results at year 3 show that a combined nutrition and PA program had greatest benefits on improving diet (variety of foods eaten), and reducing unhealthy snacking, and increasing PA. Neither the partial program or control schools displayed positive changes. The researchers reflect that the full program allowed greater involvement from all parties involved (schools, parents, children’s, educational and health partners) which led to changes becoming an integral part of the school routine. Focusing on nutrition and PA together seemed to encourage complementary behavioural changes compared to focusing only on PA.
Abstract
Schools can help to improve children's health. The 'Healthy Primary School of the Future' (HPSF) aims to sustainably integrate health and well-being into the school system. This study examined the effects of HPSF on children's dietary and physical activity (PA) behaviours after 1 and 2 years' follow-up. The study (n = 1676 children) has a quasi-experimental design with four intervention schools, i.e., two full HPSF (focus: nutrition and PA) and two partial HPSF (focus: PA), and four control schools. Accelerometers and child- and parent-reported questionnaires were used at baseline, after 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years. Mixed-model analyses showed significant favourable effects for the full HPSF versus control schools for, among others, school water consumption (effect size (ES) = 1.03 (T1), 1.14 (T2)), lunch intake of vegetables (odds ratio (OR) = 3.17 (T1), 4.39 (T2)) and dairy products (OR = 4.43 (T1), 4.52 (T2)), sedentary time (ES = -0.23 (T2)) and light PA (ES = 0.22 (T2)). Almost no significant favourable effects were found for partial HPSF compared to control schools. We conclude that the full HPSF is effective in promoting children's health behaviours at T1 and T2 compared with control schools. Focusing on both nutrition and PA components seems to be more effective in promoting healthy behaviours than focusing exclusively on PA.